AJR ARRS: Your Link to CME
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Brant-Zawadzki, M
Right arrow Articles by Lane, B
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Brant-Zawadzki, M
Right arrow Articles by Lane, B
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 140, Issue 2, 347-353
Copyright © 1983 by American Roentgen Ray Society


Articles

Digital subtraction cerebral angiography by intraarterial injection: comparison with conventional angiography

M Brant-Zawadzki, R Gould, D Norman, TH Newton, and B Lane

For 4 months, a prototype digital subtraction system was used to obtain images of the cerebral vasculature after intraarterial contrast injections. In 12 instances, the intraarterial injections were recorded with both a digital subtraction unit and conventional direct magnification film-screen system. The digital subtraction and conventional film subtraction images were compared and graded for quality and information content by three skilled observers. In addition, quantitative measurements of contrast-detail performance and spatial resolution were obtained on both the digital system and the screen-film imaging chain. In a clinical setting, both the digital subtraction and conventional film-screen systems provided similar quality images and angiographic information. Contrast-detail curves demonstrated that digital subtraction angiography outperformed conventional film technique for low-contrast objects. Digital subtraction angiography also reduced the time required to obtain the angiogram, markedly reduced film cost, and lowered the contrast agent burden.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
PERSPECT VASC SURG ENDOVASC THERHome page
W. M. Kelly
Current Role of Digital Subtraction Angiography
Perspectives in Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy, January 1, 1989; 2(1): 105 - 119.
[PDF]


Home page
Arch SurgHome page
G. Andros, R. W. Harris, L. B. Dulawa, R. W. Oblath, and S. X. Salles-Cunha
The Need for Arteriography in Diabetic Patients With Gangrene and Palpable Foot Pulses
Arch Surg, November 1, 1984; 119(11): 1260 - 1263.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1983 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.