AJR Women's Imaging Online
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mancini, G.
Right arrow Articles by Higgins, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mancini, G.
Right arrow Articles by Higgins, C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 140, Issue 3, 425-430
Copyright © 1983 by American Roentgen Ray Society


Articles

Intravenous vs. left ventricular injection of ionic contrast material: hemodynamic implications for digital subtraction angiography

GB Mancini, DR Ostrander, RA Slutsky, R Shabetai, and CB Higgins

Because of the increased use of intravenous injection of contrast material for the evaluation of cardiac structure and function by digital subtraction techniques, a study was done to assess the hemodynamic effects of contrast material when used in this fashion in man. In 10 patients, with each serving as his own control, the effects of intravenous and intraventricular injections of sodium meglumine diatrizoate (Renografin 76) in the same dose were compared. There was no difference between these two methods with respect to changes in pulmonary wedge pressures, systemic pressures, and pulmonary vascular resistance. The elevation of mean pulmonary artery and right atrial pressure was greater after the intraventricular injection (p less than 0.05). The elevated cardiac output and systemic vascular resistance returned to control values somewhat more quickly after the intravenous injection (p less than 0.001 and p less than 0.05, respectively); and the increase in cardiac output was greater after the intravenous injection at 1 min (p less than 0.05), but less than after the intraventricular injection at 2 min (p less than 0.05). Despite the detection of these statistically significant differences, the magnitude and timing of these differences are too small to justify the notion that imaging by intravenous injections of standard ionic contrast media provides any substantial hemodynamic benefits or decreased risk to the patient.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
M. B. Pitton, G. Kemmerich, S. Herber, E. Mayer, M. Thelen, and C. Duber
Hemodynamic effects of monomeric nonionic contrast media in pulmonary angiography in chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension.
Am. J. Roentgenol., July 1, 2006; 187(1): 128 - 134.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
L. V. Hofmann, D. S. Lee, A. Gupta, A. Arepally, S. Sood, R. Girgis, and J. Eng
Safety and Hemodynamic Effects of Pulmonary Angiography in Patients with Pulmonary Hypertension: 10-Year Single-Center Experience
Am. J. Roentgenol., September 1, 2004; 183(3): 779 - 785.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
M. B. Pitton, C. Duber, E. Mayer, and M. Thelen
Hemodynamic Effects of Nonionic Contrast Bolus Injection and Oxygen Inhalation During Pulmonary Angiography in Patients With Chronic Major-Vessel Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension
Circulation, November 15, 1996; 94(10): 2485 - 2491.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1983 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.