AJR ARRS Member Benefits
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Foley, W.
Right arrow Articles by Milde, M
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Foley, W.
Right arrow Articles by Milde, M
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 140, Issue 3, 497-499
Copyright © 1983 by American Roentgen Ray Society


Articles

Digital subtraction angiography of the portal venous system

WD Foley, ET Stewart, Milbrath JR, M SanDretto, and M Milde

Venous-phase arteriography after celiac or superior mesenteric artery injection is the most common technique used to demonstrate portal venous anatomy, flow direction, and portal systemic shunts. Large-volume contrast material injections and intraarterial vasodilators or balloon occlusion technique are required for optimal examinations using film-screen recording. A technique for performing venous-phase arteriography with digital subtraction imaging after celiac and superior mesenteric artery injection is described. The major advantage of intraarterial digital subtraction technique in comparison to film-screen recording is sensitivity to intravascular iodine with a consequent reduction in contrast material load and examination time. Technical success is limited only by motion artifact and should approximate the 80%-90% figure achieved for intravenous digital subtraction angiography of the aortorenal vessels.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ANGIOLOGYHome page
R. P. Sharma, P.C. Shetty, M. W. Burke, C. E. Keller, and D. P. Swanson
Portal Hypertension Workup by DSA
Angiology, March 1, 1987; 38(3): 226 - 231.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1983 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.