AJR ARRS: Your Link to CME
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dunne, M.
Right arrow Articles by Cunat, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dunne, M.
Right arrow Articles by Cunat, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 140, Issue 4, 741-743
Copyright © 1983 by American Roentgen Ray Society


Articles

Sonographic determination of fetal gender before 25 weeks gestation

MG Dunne and JS Cunat

Sonographic determination of fetal gender was attempted prospectively in 121 consecutive routine obstetric scans between 10 and 25 weeks gestation. There were two sets of twins in this group, so a total of 123 fetuses was studied. Birth records were subsequently available in 113 of these fetuses at which time conclusive data regarding the fetal gender could be analyzed. Of these 113 fetuses, a sonographic determination of fetal gender was made in 53 (47%). There were three errors in this group of 53 (error rate 6%) and all of these incorrect determinations were male fetuses thought to be females in utero by sonography. There were no errors in those called male by sonography in utero. The male-female mix demonstrated a higher number of males in the group in whom sonographic determination was possible. There was a lower number of males than females in the group in whom the gender of the fetus could not be detected by sonography. A significantly higher number of males (60) than females (53) was present in the study population for no apparent reason.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Diagnostic Medical SonographyHome page
S. Zafaranloo, P. S. Gerard, and G. Wise
Sonographic Assessment of Fetal Male Genitalia
Journal of Diagnostic Medical Sonography, July 1, 1991; 7(4): 205 - 207.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1983 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.