AJR Track the topics, authors and articles important to you
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wood, G.
Right arrow Articles by Chambers, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wood, G.
Right arrow Articles by Chambers, A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 140, Issue 5, 855-859
Copyright © 1983 by American Roentgen Ray Society


Articles

Digital subtraction angiography with intravenous injection: assessment of 1,000 carotid bifurcations

GW Wood, RR Lukin, TA Tomsick, and AA Chambers

Digital subtraction angiography (DSA) with intravenous contrast injection was performed on 500 consecutive adult patients and evaluated for image quality of the carotid artery bifurcations. Diagnostic quality examinations were obtained in 974 common, 925 internal, and 904 external carotid artery segments. Sixty-two patients had standard carotid arteriography around the same time as DSA. Agreement of standard arteriograms with diagnostic quality DSA examinations was noted in 97 of 98 common, 94 of 95 internal, and 79 of 91 external carotid artery segments. All cases of complete carotid occlusion (14 of 14) were correctly interpreted by DSA. To identify a population with clinically significant stenosis, a 60% or greater reduction in diameter of the internal carotid was defined as a positive examination. Applying this criterion, the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of DSA as compared with standard arteriography was about 94%.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
StrokeHome page
P. M. Rothwell, S. T. Pendlebury, J. Wardlaw, and C. P. Warlow
Critical Appraisal of the Design and Reporting of Studies of Imaging and Measurement of Carotid Stenosis
Stroke, June 1, 2000; 31(6): 1444 - 1450.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1983 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.