AJR Your Link to CME
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Subramanyam, B.
Right arrow Articles by Horii, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Subramanyam, B.
Right arrow Articles by Horii, S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 140, Issue 5, 991-993
Copyright © 1983 by American Roentgen Ray Society


Articles

Sonography of pyonephrosis: a prospective study

BR Subramanyam, BN Raghavendra, MA Bosniak, RS Lefleur, RJ Rosen, and SC Horii

Sonograms of 73 patients with 92 hydronephrotic kidneys were prospectively reviewed in an attempt to differentiate hydronephrosis from pyonephrosis. Sonographic diagnosis of pyonephrosis was based on the presence of persistent internal echoes, dispersed or dependent, within the dilated pelvocaliceal system. In group 1, consisting of 38 patients without clinical evidence of renal infection, sonography revealed the collecting system distended by urine to be anechoic, for a specificity of 100%. In group 2, consisting of 34 patients with clinical suspicion of renal infection, sonography showed internal echoes within the fluid-filled collecting system in 10 cases; nine of these had pyonephrosis (sensitivity of 90%), and one had hemorrhagic debris without infection (false-positive rate 3%). In the other 24 patients, sonography correctly predicted the absence of infection in all but one case (specificity 97%, false-negative rate 10%). It is concluded that in patients with clinical suspicion of renal infection, sonography has a high degree of accuracy (96%) in the differentiation of pyonephrosis from hydronephrosis.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
W. D. Craig, B. J. Wagner, and M. D. Travis
From the Archives of the AFIP: Pyelonephritis: Radiologic-Pathologic Review
RadioGraphics, January 1, 2008; 28(1): 255 - 276.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
P. J. Pickhardt, G. J. Lonergan, C. J. Davis Jr, N. Kashitani, and B. J. Wagner
From the Archives of the AFIP : Infiltrative Renal Lesions: Radiologic-Pathologic Correlation
RadioGraphics, January 1, 2000; 20(1): 215 - 243.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1983 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.