|
|
||||||||
Articles |
A total of 1,140 primary colorectal carcinomas found in 1084 patients during a 5 1/2-year period (1976 to mid-1981) at the Mayo Clinic was reviewed to evaluate the accuracy of detection by the double- and single-contrast barium enema examinations. Both methods were equally sensitive in detecting colon cancer above the proctoscopic level. The error rate (ulcerative colitis excluded) was 4.8% for the single-contrast enema and 4.7% for the double-contrast study. Neither type of examination was superior in finding smaller lesions or earlier staged lesions. Several causes for error were identified: fluoroscopic inexperience, technical factors, misinterpretation of radiologic findings, and distraction.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
B. Levin, D. A. Lieberman, B. McFarland, R. A. Smith, D. Brooks, K. S. Andrews, C. Dash, F. M. Giardiello, S. Glick, T. R. Levin, et al. Screening and Surveillance for the Early Detection of Colorectal Cancer and Adenomatous Polyps, 2008: A Joint Guideline from the American Cancer Society, the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, and the American College of Radiology CA Cancer J Clin, May 1, 2008; 58(3): 130 - 160. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Sosna, T. Sella, O. Sy, P. T. Lavin, R. Eliahou, S. Fraifeld, and E. Libson Critical Analysis of the Performance of Double-Contrast Barium Enema for Detecting Colorectal Polyps >= 6 mm in the Era of CT Colonography Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2008; 190(2): 374 - 385. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. M. Thompson, W. L. Foster, E. K. Paulson, D. Niedzwiecki, V. H. S. Low, L. B. Fulford, B. W. Broomer, L. Sanders, and D. C. Rockey Comparison of radiologists and technologists in the performance of air-contrast barium enemas. Am. J. Roentgenol., September 1, 2006; 187(3): 706 - 709. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. M. Thompson, W. L. Foster, E. K. Paulson, D. Niedzwiecki, V. H. S. Low, L. B. Fulford, B. W. Broomer, L. Sanders, and D. C. Rockey Causes of Errors in Polyp Detection at Air-Contrast Barium Enema Examination Radiology, April 1, 2006; 239(1): 139 - 148. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. L. Canon, J. K. Smith, D. E. Morgan, B. C. Jones, S. C. Fell, P. J. Kenney, D. Ferrante, M. E. Lockhart, A. O. Westfall, and R. E. Koehler Double Reading of Barium Enemas: Is It Necessary? Am. J. Roentgenol., December 1, 2003; 181(6): 1607 - 1610. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Pignone, M. Rich, S. M. Teutsch, A. O. Berg, and K. N. Lohr Screening for Colorectal Cancer in Adults at Average Risk: A Summary of the Evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Ann Intern Med, July 16, 2002; 137(2): 132 - 141. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C S Ng, T C Doyle, A K Dixon, R Miller, and M J Arends Histopathological correlates of abnormal pericolic fat on CT in the assessment of colorectal carcinoma Br. J. Radiol., January 1, 2002; 75(889): 31 - 37. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Glick Double-Contrast Barium Enema for Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Review of the Issues and a Comparison with Other Screening Alternatives Am. J. Roentgenol., June 1, 2000; 174(6): 1529 - 1537. [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
G. S. Gazelle, P. M. McMahon, and F. J. Scholz Screening for Colorectal Cancer Radiology, May 1, 2000; 215(2): 327 - 335. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
G. W. Stevenson 1998 RSNA Annual Oration in Diagnostic Radiology : Colorectal Cancer Imaging: A Challenge for Radiologists Radiology, March 1, 2000; 214(3): 615 - 621. [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
W. L. England, J. J. Halls, and V. B. Hunt Strategies for Screening for Colorectal Carcinoma Med Decis Making, February 1, 1989; 9(1): 3 - 13. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |