AJR ARRS Membership
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Johnson, C.
Right arrow Articles by Weiland, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Johnson, C.
Right arrow Articles by Weiland, L.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 140, Issue 6, 1143-1149
Copyright © 1983 by American Roentgen Ray Society


Articles

Barium enemas of carcinoma of the colon: sensitivity of double- and single-contrast studies

CD Johnson, HC Carlson, WF Taylor, and LP Weiland

A total of 1,140 primary colorectal carcinomas found in 1084 patients during a 5 1/2-year period (1976 to mid-1981) at the Mayo Clinic was reviewed to evaluate the accuracy of detection by the double- and single-contrast barium enema examinations. Both methods were equally sensitive in detecting colon cancer above the proctoscopic level. The error rate (ulcerative colitis excluded) was 4.8% for the single-contrast enema and 4.7% for the double-contrast study. Neither type of examination was superior in finding smaller lesions or earlier staged lesions. Several causes for error were identified: fluoroscopic inexperience, technical factors, misinterpretation of radiologic findings, and distraction.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
CA Cancer J ClinHome page
B. Levin, D. A. Lieberman, B. McFarland, R. A. Smith, D. Brooks, K. S. Andrews, C. Dash, F. M. Giardiello, S. Glick, T. R. Levin, et al.
Screening and Surveillance for the Early Detection of Colorectal Cancer and Adenomatous Polyps, 2008: A Joint Guideline from the American Cancer Society, the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, and the American College of Radiology
CA Cancer J Clin, May 1, 2008; 58(3): 130 - 160.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
J. Sosna, T. Sella, O. Sy, P. T. Lavin, R. Eliahou, S. Fraifeld, and E. Libson
Critical Analysis of the Performance of Double-Contrast Barium Enema for Detecting Colorectal Polyps >= 6 mm in the Era of CT Colonography
Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2008; 190(2): 374 - 385.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
W. M. Thompson, W. L. Foster, E. K. Paulson, D. Niedzwiecki, V. H. S. Low, L. B. Fulford, B. W. Broomer, L. Sanders, and D. C. Rockey
Comparison of radiologists and technologists in the performance of air-contrast barium enemas.
Am. J. Roentgenol., September 1, 2006; 187(3): 706 - 709.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
W. M. Thompson, W. L. Foster, E. K. Paulson, D. Niedzwiecki, V. H. S. Low, L. B. Fulford, B. W. Broomer, L. Sanders, and D. C. Rockey
Causes of Errors in Polyp Detection at Air-Contrast Barium Enema Examination
Radiology, April 1, 2006; 239(1): 139 - 148.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
C. L. Canon, J. K. Smith, D. E. Morgan, B. C. Jones, S. C. Fell, P. J. Kenney, D. Ferrante, M. E. Lockhart, A. O. Westfall, and R. E. Koehler
Double Reading of Barium Enemas: Is It Necessary?
Am. J. Roentgenol., December 1, 2003; 181(6): 1607 - 1610.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
M. Pignone, M. Rich, S. M. Teutsch, A. O. Berg, and K. N. Lohr
Screening for Colorectal Cancer in Adults at Average Risk: A Summary of the Evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force
Ann Intern Med, July 16, 2002; 137(2): 132 - 141.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
C S Ng, T C Doyle, A K Dixon, R Miller, and M J Arends
Histopathological correlates of abnormal pericolic fat on CT in the assessment of colorectal carcinoma
Br. J. Radiol., January 1, 2002; 75(889): 31 - 37.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
S. Glick
Double-Contrast Barium Enema for Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Review of the Issues and a Comparison with Other Screening Alternatives
Am. J. Roentgenol., June 1, 2000; 174(6): 1529 - 1537.
[Full Text]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
G. S. Gazelle, P. M. McMahon, and F. J. Scholz
Screening for Colorectal Cancer
Radiology, May 1, 2000; 215(2): 327 - 335.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
G. W. Stevenson
1998 RSNA Annual Oration in Diagnostic Radiology : Colorectal Cancer Imaging: A Challenge for Radiologists
Radiology, March 1, 2000; 214(3): 615 - 621.
[Full Text]


Home page
Med Decis MakingHome page
W. L. England, J. J. Halls, and V. B. Hunt
Strategies for Screening for Colorectal Carcinoma
Med Decis Making, February 1, 1989; 9(1): 3 - 13.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1983 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.