AJR Track the topics, authors and articles important to you
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Grant, E.
Right arrow Articles by Jacobs, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Grant, E.
Right arrow Articles by Jacobs, N.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 141, Issue 1, 29-32
Copyright © 1983 by American Roentgen Ray Society


Articles

Fine-needle biopsy directed by real-time sonography: technique and accuracy

EG Grant, JD Richardson, JG Smirniotopoulos, and NM Jacobs

A real-time mechanical sector scanner and attachable biopsy apparatus was used to guide fine-needle aspirations of 61 consecutive abdominal masses suspected of representing metastatic or primary malignant disease. Among these 61 patients, 15 had pancreatic masses and 32 had hepatic lesions, either solitary or multiple. The other 14 patients had possible recurrence of gynecologic malignancy either locally or within the retroperitoneum, or abdominal wall or retroperitoneal masses. Although various methods of fine-needle biopsy with real-time guidance have been described, the advantages and actual accuracy of this method have not been emphasized adequately. This technique was accurate in 57 (93.4%) of 61 cases, with only two apparent instances of incorrect needle placement. Although many institutions prefer CT guidance over sonography, this method offers numerous advantages and should be the method of choice in fine-needle biopsy guidance in the oncologic population.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
CLIN PEDIATRHome page
H. K. Rosenberg and N. H. Sherman
Ultrasound Guidance: For Interventional and Intraoperative Techniques in Infants and Children
Clinical Pediatrics, August 1, 1990; 29(8): 457 - 464.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Diagnostic Medical SonographyHome page
W. Nash, T. Fabian, and M. De Lange
Ultrasound and CT-Guided Percutaneous Interventiona Procedures of the Abdomen
Journal of Diagnostic Medical Sonography, March 1, 1986; 2(2): 86 - 92.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1983 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.