AJR InPractice
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hadlock, F.
Right arrow Articles by Park, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hadlock, F.
Right arrow Articles by Park, S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 141, Issue 5, 979-984
Copyright © 1983 by American Roentgen Ray Society


Articles

A date-independent predictor of intrauterine growth retardation: femur length/abdominal circumference ratio

FP Hadlock, RL Deter, RB Harrist, E Roecker, and SK Park

The relation between sonographically measured fetal femur length and abdominal circumference (expressed as femur length/abdominal circumference X 100) was studied in 361 normal pregnancies between 15 and 42 weeks. This ratio was found to be independent of menstrual age, with a normal range after 21 weeks (mean +/- 2 SD) of 22 +/- 2. This ratio also was evaluated as a predictor of intrauterine growth retardation in 30 cases using the 90th percentile (23.5) as the upper limit of normal, which resulted in identification of 63% of the growth-retarded fetuses. Because it is independent of menstrual age, this ratio should prove most useful in evaluating high-risk patients who present in the third trimester of pregnancy with no dates. It is also of value in detecting growth retardation in patients with good menstrual history, since it was shown to become abnormal in asymmetrically growth-retarded fetuses before the estimated weight fell below the 10th percentile.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Ultrasound MedHome page
P. M. Doubilet, C. B. Benson, L. Wilkins-Haug, and S. Ringer
Fetuses Subsequently Born Premature Are Smaller Than Gestational Age-Matched Fetuses Not Born Premature
J. Ultrasound Med., April 1, 2003; 22(4): 359 - 363.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1983 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.