AJR ARRS: Your Link to CME
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Moyle, J.
Right arrow Articles by Krause, P
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Moyle, J.
Right arrow Articles by Krause, P
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 141, Issue 5, 985-991
Copyright © 1983 by American Roentgen Ray Society


Articles

Sonography of ovarian tumors: predictability of tumor type

JW Moyle, D Rochester, L Sider, K Shrock, and P Krause

One hundred six ovarian neoplasms were evaluated with respect to size, echogenic characteristics, and percentage of echogenic material to determine if sonography could differentiate between malignant and benign tumors and if histology could be determined. This study indicates that anechoic lesions have high likelihood of being benign tumors, usually mucinous cystadenomas or serous cystadenomas. As the percentage of echogenic material increases, the likelihood of malignancy also increases. There are two exceptions to this rule. The first is lesions with very echogenic foci, which are virtually always benign teratomas. The second is groups of tumors that are totally or near-totally echogenic. These are actually less likely to be malignancies than mixed-density tumors that have a large anechoic component. In mixed-echogenicity tumors that are not teratomas, there was no way of distinguishing between benign and malignant lesions with an acceptable degree of accuracy in an individual case. Also, with the exception of teratomas, histology could not be determined. It should be noted that in the postmenopausal patient, the maximum size of a normal ovary is 2 X 1.5 X 0.5 cm. An adnexal mass larger than this must be considered suspicious of a neoplasm.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Ultrasound MedHome page
C.-Y. Chen, Y.-C. Wu, M.-S. Yen, J.-H. Hung, C.-C. Yuan, and K.-C. Chao
The Power Doppler Velocity Index, Pulsatility Index, and Resistive Index Can Assist in Making a Differential Diagnosis of Primary Ovarian Carcinoma and Krukenberg Tumors: A Preliminary Study
J. Ultrasound Med., July 1, 2007; 26(7): 921 - 926.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1983 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.