AJR Join ARRS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hoffman, M.
Right arrow Articles by Pais, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hoffman, M.
Right arrow Articles by Pais, S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 142, Issue 2, 261-264
Copyright © 1984 by American Roentgen Ray Society


Articles

Limitations in the interpretation of intravenous carotid digital subtraction angiography

MG Hoffman, AS Gomes, and SO Pais

To evaluate the limitations of intravenous carotid digital subtraction angiography (DSA) in the diagnosis of carotid disease, studies of 130 patients were reviewed. Factors that resulted in a nondiagnostic study included: (1) misregistration larynx artifact overlying the carotid bifurcation; (2) external carotid or vertebral artery overlying the internal carotid artery; and (3) poor arterial contrast density secondary to poor cardiac function. As a result of these limitations, the ideal of adequate demonstration of both carotid bifurcations in two opposite oblique projections or an oblique and anteroposterior projection was achieved in only 34 patients (26%). Of 126 carotid bifurcations that were seen adequately in two or more different projections, 19 (15%) showed an abnormality in one projection but appeared normal in another. These abnormalities would not have been detected had the vessel been visualized only in the spuriously normal-appearing projection. These and other limitations of intravenous DSA, such as contrast load and morbidity, are discussed.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
StrokeHome page
P. M. Rothwell, S. T. Pendlebury, J. Wardlaw, and C. P. Warlow
Critical Appraisal of the Design and Reporting of Studies of Imaging and Measurement of Carotid Stenosis
Stroke, June 1, 2000; 31(6): 1444 - 1450.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PERSPECT VASC SURG ENDOVASC THERHome page
W. M. Kelly
Current Role of Digital Subtraction Angiography
Perspectives in Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy, January 1, 1989; 2(1): 105 - 119.
[PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1984 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.