|
|
||||||||
Articles |
Excised urinary calculi were subjected to computed tomographic (CT) scanning in an attempt to determine whether CT attenuation values would allow accurate analysis of stone composition. The mean, maximum, and modal pixel densities of the calculi were recorded and compared; the resulting values reflected considerable heterogeneity in stone density. Although uric acid and cystine calculi could be identified by their discrete ranges on one or more of these criteria, calcium-containing stones of various compositions, including struvite, could not be distinguished reliably. CT analysis of stone density is not likely to be more accurate than standard radiography in characterizing stone composition in vivo.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R. Grosjean, B. Sauer, R. M. Guerra, M. Daudon, A. Blum, J. Felblinger, and J. Hubert Characterization of Human Renal Stones with MDCT: Advantage of Dual Energy and Limitations Due to Respiratory Motion Am. J. Roentgenol., March 1, 2008; 190(3): 720 - 728. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. E. Tublin, M. E. Murphy, D. M. Delong, F. N. Tessler, and M. A. Kliewer Conspicuity of Renal Calculi at Unenhanced CT: Effects of Calculus Composition and Size and CT Technique Radiology, October 1, 2002; 225(1): 91 - 96. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. J. Zagoria, E. G. Khatod, and M. Y. M. Chen Abdominal Radiography After CT Reveals Urinary Calculi: A Method to Predict Usefulness of Abdominal Radiography on the Basis of Size and CT Attenuation of Calculi Am. J. Roentgenol., May 1, 2001; 176(5): 1117 - 1122. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. C. Saw, J. A. McAteer, A. G. Monga, G. T. Chua, J. E. Lingeman, and J. C. Williams Jr. Helical CT of Urinary Calculi: Effect of Stone Composition, Stone Size, and Scan Collimation Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2000; 175(2): 329 - 332. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. C. Smith and M. Varanelli Diagnosis and Management of Acute Ureterolithiasis: CT Is Truth Am. J. Roentgenol., July 1, 2000; 175(1): 3 - 6. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |