AJR Join ARRS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rimkus, D
Right arrow Articles by Baily, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rimkus, D
Right arrow Articles by Baily, N.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 142, Issue 3, 603-608
Copyright © 1984 by American Roentgen Ray Society


Articles

Patient exposure requirements for high contrast resolution in digital radiographic systems

D Rimkus and NA Baily

The contrast resolution of modern digital radiographic equipment is primarily limited by quantum mottle. The derivation of the contrast resolution of a system as a function of radiation exposure is presented. Calculations based on this derivation show that achieving 0.8% contrast resolution (128 meaningful gray levels) with 1-mm spatial resolution may require a patient exposure of 1.7 rad (1.7 cGy) per image of a thick body part (20 cm tissue). Acceptable clinical studies often can be obtained with only 5% contrast resolution (20 meaningful shades of gray), but even this level of contrast may require a patient exposure of nearly 90 mrad (0.9 mGy) per image. A comparison of three commonly used methods of reducing patient radiation exposure (pulsed imaging, temporal averaging, and recursive filtering) shows that, in theory, a pulsed system achieves the highest contrast resolution for the same total exposure.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
L. J. M. Kroft, W. J. H. Veldkamp, B. J. A. Mertens, M. V. Boot, and J. Geleijns
Comparison of Eight Different Digital Chest Radiography Systems: Variation in Detection of Simulated Chest Disease
Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2005; 185(2): 339 - 346.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1984 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.