AJR Women's Imaging Online
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Weaver, K.
Right arrow Articles by Lewicki, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Weaver, K.
Right arrow Articles by Lewicki, A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 142, Issue 3, 615-618
Copyright © 1984 by American Roentgen Ray Society


Articles

Comparative image quality of 105 mm and conventional spot films

KE Weaver, CA Trembley, and AM Lewicki

The image qualities of 105 mm film (Cronex MRF-21) and a conventional screen-film (Hi-Plus/Cronex 4) were compared for gastrointestinal studies, a high-contrast-resolution procedure, using a General Electric MPX 100/Fluoricon 300 x-ray system. The high contrast resolution was determined at a location approximating the midplane of an average-sized patient (20 cm). Films were made for each image-intensifier mode (9, 6, and 4.5 inch [22.9, 15.2, and 11.4 cm]) and compared with the conventional screen-film for contrast transfer (modulation-transfer function) and maximum cutoff frequency. The effects of unsharpness caused by patient motion were included in the analysis. The patient entrance exposure was measured for each technique. In the absence of patient motion, the cutoff frequencies for the spot films in the 9, 6, and 4.5 inch (22.9, 15.2, and 11.4 cm) modes were 2.1, 2.3, and 2.4 line pairs/mm, respectively. The cutoff frequency for the conventional spot-film was 2.0 line pairs/mm. The modulation-transfer functions for the 105 mm films in the 9, 6, and 4.5 inch (22.9, 15.2, and 11.4 cm) modes were found to be equal to or superior to those of the conventional screen-film for all degrees of patient motion. The 6 inch (15.2 cm), 105 mm films were found to have the best overall performance. These results were achieved with a reduction in radiation dose of 55%.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1984 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.