|
|
||||||||
Articles |
A comparison was made of sonography and computed tomography (CT) for the diagnosis of choledocholithiasis. Sonography correctly diagnosed nine of 49 patients with choledocholithiasis for a sensitivity rate of 18%. The accuracy rate for sonography was 19%; there were five false-positive examinations. CT correctly identified common duct stones in 26 of 30 patients for a sensitivity rate of 87%. The accuracy rate was 84%; there was one false positive. Sonography is limited in its ability to image calculi in the distal common bile duct. CT is effective for imaging common duct stones and is superior to sonography for diagnosing this cause of biliary obstruction.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. W. Anderson, E. Rho, and J. A. Soto Detection of Biliary Duct Narrowing and Choledocholithiasis: Accuracy of Portal Venous Phase Multidetector CT Radiology, May 1, 2008; 247(2): 418 - 427. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. W. Anderson, B. C. Lucey, J. C. Varghese, and J. A. Soto Accuracy of MDCT in the diagnosis of choledocholithiasis. Am. J. Roentgenol., July 1, 2006; 187(1): 174 - 180. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. H. Miller, C. M. Hwang, H. Gabriel, L. A. Goodhartz, A. J. Omar, and W. G. Parsons III Contrast-Enhanced Helical CT of Choledocholithiasis Am. J. Roentgenol., July 1, 2003; 181(1): 125 - 130. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. T. Harvey and W. T. Miller Jr Acute Biliary Disease: Initial CT and Follow-up US versus Initial US and Follow-up CT Radiology, December 1, 1999; 213(3): 831 - 836. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |