AJR Your Link to CME
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kidd, R
Right arrow Articles by Dail, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kidd, R
Right arrow Articles by Dail, D.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 142, Issue 5, 1007-1012
Copyright © 1984 by American Roentgen Ray Society


Articles

Lymphangiography and fine-needle aspiration biopsy: ineffective for staging early prostate cancer

R Kidd, RD Crane, and DH Dail

Four hundred thirty-six patients with carcinoma of the prostate had lymphangiography (LAG) as part of their initial evaluation before treatment. Fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) of abnormal opacified lymph nodes was performed routinely. The positivity rate of LAG and FNAB in each clinical stage was compared with the positivity rate predicted for that stage, based on published series of patients with carcinoma of the prostate who underwent pelvic lymph node dissection (LND). Within each clinical stage, the relation of the outcome of LAG/FNAB to histologic tumor grade (Gleason score) and serum acid phosphatase levels was evaluated. LAG/FNAB was of very limited value in patients with less than clinical stage C disease and of no value in patients with a Gleason score of less than 6. Although LAG/FNAB is insensitive even in clinical stage C disease, a positive result will avoid the morbidity and expense of a staging LND and allow confident selection of appropriate treatment. A negative LAG/FNAB, on the other hand, is meaningless, because of the high false-negative rate of LAG. Since no two study populations are exactly alike, any evaluation or comparison of tests used to stage patients with carcinoma of the prostate should state the distribution of its patients by clinical stage.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1984 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.