AJR Women's Imaging Online
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Baumstark, A
Right arrow Articles by Abrams, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Baumstark, A
Right arrow Articles by Abrams, H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 142, Issue 5, 877-884
Copyright © 1984 by American Roentgen Ray Society


Articles

Evaluating the radiographic assessment of pulmonary venous hypertension in chronic heart disease

A Baumstark, RG Swensson, SJ Hessel, DC Levin, W Grossman, JT Mann 3rd, and HL Abrams

This study evaluated how accurately the chest film could be used to determine pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCW) in patients with chronic heart disease. Six experienced readers interpreted the erect posteroanterior chest radiographs of 50 patients whose measured PCWs ranged from 6 to 38 mm Hg. Direct numeric estimates of PCW from the films were closely related to measured levels of PCW (r = 0.675). This linear correlation increased to 0.81 when individual-reader variations were reduced by taking a "consensus" (mean) of the six readers' estimates for each case. A combination of the judged degree of pulmonary blood flow redistribution (PFR) and three particular signs of pulmonary venous hypertension (PVH), basal and perihilar vascular blurring and alveolar edema, adequately summarized the radiographic information about PCW. These combined judgments of PFR/PVH identified films from patients with higher and lower PCW levels as accurately as readers' numeric estimates of PCW. Other radiographic signs (enlargement of the heart and central pulmonary vessels and the presence of Kerley lines or pleural effusion) were also positively related to increases in PCW, but added little to the information provided by the PFR/PVH criteria.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1984 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.