AJR ARRS Membership
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Smathers, R.
Right arrow Articles by Heiken, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Smathers, R.
Right arrow Articles by Heiken, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 143, Issue 2, 255-259
Copyright © 1984 by American Roentgen Ray Society


Articles

Differentiation of complicated cholecystitis from gallbladder carcinoma by computed tomography

RL Smathers, JK Lee, and JP Heiken

Differentiation between complicated cholecystitis and advanced gallbladder carcinoma can be difficult when clinical findings are confusing. Computed tomographic (CT) scans were reviewed from 22 patients with a surgical diagnosis of complicated cholecystitis (11 cases) or advanced gallbladder carcinoma (11 cases). The presence of a curvilinear low-attenuation "halo" around the gallbladder wall was specific for complicated cholecystitis. Findings indicative of gallbladder carcinoma included a focal soft-tissue mass, biliary obstruction at the level of the porta hepatis, and direct hepatic invasion or metastases. Other findings, such as diffuse wall thickening, streaky soft-tissue densities in the pericholecystic fat, and thickening of the hepatoduodenal ligament, could be seen in both entities and, therefore, were less useful in differentiating these two disease processes. Knowledge of these differential CT findings may result in a more accurate preoperative diagnosis.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
B. H. Ching, B. M. Yeh, A. C. Westphalen, B. N. Joe, A. Qayyum, and F. V. Coakley
CT Differentiation of Adenomyomatosis and Gallbladder Cancer
Am. J. Roentgenol., July 1, 2007; 189(1): 62 - 66.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
D. Grand, K. M. Horton, and E. Fishman
CT of the Gallbladder: Spectrum of Disease
Am. J. Roentgenol., July 1, 2004; 183(1): 163 - 170.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
A. D. Levy, L. A. Murakata, and C. A. Rohrmann Jr
Gallbladder Carcinoma: Radiologic-Pathologic Correlation
RadioGraphics, March 1, 2001; 21(2): 295 - 314.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Diagnostic Medical SonographyHome page
C. C. Kuni
Patterns of Gallbladder Wall Thickening
Journal of Diagnostic Medical Sonography, March 1, 1990; 6(2): 73 - 78.
[PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1984 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.