AJR ARRS Member Benefits
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Popky, G.
Right arrow Articles by Consigny, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Popky, G.
Right arrow Articles by Consigny, P.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 143, Issue 2, 317-319
Copyright © 1984 by American Roentgen Ray Society


Articles

Comparison of superior vena cava and antecubital vein as DSA injection site

GL Popky, PH Saluk, LB Griska, JA Parker, and PM Consigny

A prospective study in 47 patients was undertaken to determine which of the two major sites for injection of contrast material, superior vena cava or antecubital vein, produces digital subtraction images of higher quality. Both injection sites were used to obtain images of the carotid and aortic arch areas in each patient. The two injection sites were also compared for ease of performance of the study, patient acceptance, and incidence of complications and motion artifacts. It was determined that the degree of vessel conspicuity is not affected by injection site when equal volumes of contrast material are injected. No significant differences in overall image quality attributable to injection site were found, except for carotid images obtained in the anteroposterior projection; for these images, the antecubital vein injection site produced significantly better images. Vessel conspicuity was not the major determinant of overall image quality as judged by radiologists.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1984 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.