AJR Women's Imaging Online
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lang, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lang, E.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 143, Issue 4, 795-801
Copyright © 1984 by American Roentgen Ray Society


Articles

Antegrade ureteral stenting for dehiscence, strictures, and fistulae

EK Lang

Percutaneous placement of ureteral stents is advocated as an attractive alternative to surgical procedures in the management of some ureteral dehiscence, strictures, and inflammatory ureteral fistulae. In 50 patients with partial dehiscence or fistulae, a stent could be placed percutaneously in 41. The method achieved a salvage rate of renal function (30 cases [60%]) similar to that of open surgical correction. Hospitalization time and costs, however, were far less. The method proved particularly successful (nine of 10 cases) for correction of pelvic ureters severed from the bladder during pelvic surgery, dehiscence of ureteroneocystostomies into boari flaps, and traumatic severance of the upper and mid ureters. The method is also highly recommended for the management of strictures occurring at ureteroileostomy sites and at the ureteroneocystostomy site of cadaver transplant kidneys. Although the ultimate salvage of renal function is lower than in the above-described conditions, the relative ease of placing percutaneous stent catheters across such strictures in comparison with highly complex surgical salvage procedures necessary to correct these conditions makes the former the first choice.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1984 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.