AJR Women's Imaging Online
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hillman, B.
Right arrow Articles by Williams, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hillman, B.
Right arrow Articles by Williams, A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 143, Issue 4, 913-917
Copyright © 1984 by American Roentgen Ray Society


Articles

Adoption and diffusion of a new imaging technology: a magnetic resonance imaging prospective

BJ Hillman, JD Winkler, CE Phelps, J Aroesty, and AP Williams

Adoption of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) by individual purchasers and by the health care system will be influenced by many factors. A framework for considering these influences is offered, incorporating them into four major considerations: (1) MRI and its attributes--the technology, its safety and efficacy, and the benefits of acquisition; (2) communication channels--commercial and professional; (3) time for consideration of adoption and experiential testing; and (4) the medical system--including potential acquirers, health planning, and reimbursement. Among these, positive, negative, and variable influences affecting adoption can be identified. Factors that should most strongly motivate early adoption are the potential of the technology for providing new and useful clinical information and the competitive and economic benefits that early acquirers might enjoy. Important discouragements include the possibility of early obsolescence and that MRI represents an economic risk under diagnostic-related-group reimbursement. The less risky approach for most practices is to delay acquisition of MRI pending further experience with the technology and the changing reimbursement climate. Institutions that are primarily interested in the research potential of MRI or that are large enough to sustain the economic risks should consider earlier acquisition.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JBJSHome page
K. J. Bozic, R. G. Pierce, and J. H. Herndon
Health Care Technology Assessment. Basic Principles and Clinical Applications
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., June 1, 2004; 86(6): 1305 - 1314.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1984 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.