AJR Join ARRS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lee, J.
Right arrow Articles by Murphy, W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lee, J.
Right arrow Articles by Murphy, W.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 143, Issue 6, 1197-1202
Copyright © 1984 by American Roentgen Ray Society


Articles

Magnetic resonance imaging of abdominal aortic aneurysms

JK Lee, D Ling, JP Heiken, HS Glazer, GA Sicard, WG Totty, RG Levitt, and WA Murphy

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was performed in 20 patients with radiologically or surgically proven abdominal aortic aneurysms using a Siemens Magnetom scanner with a 0.35-T superconductive magnet. On MRI, rapidly flowing blood emits little or no signal and appears black; stagnant blood, turbulent flow, and atheromatous plaques produce signals of various intensities and are imaged as light to medium gray. Of nine patients who underwent surgical repair, MRI correctly demonstrated the origin of the aortic aneurysm in nine and accurately determined the status of the iliac arteries in eight. In two patients in whom intravenous contrast administration was contraindicated, MRI provided the correct diagnosis of a mycotic pseudoaneurysm in one and clearly distinguished the iliac arteries from the surrounding fibrosis in the other. Of 11 patients who did not have surgical repair, MRI findings correlated well with other radiologic studies. MRI was found to be more reliable than sonography in determining the relation between the aneurysm and the renal arteries as well as the status of the iliac arteries. Despite these advantages, the authors still advocate sonography as the screening procedure of choice in patients with suspected abdominal aortic aneurysms because of its lower cost and east of performance. MRI should be reserved for patients who have had unsuccessful or equivocal sonographic examinations.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
I. Koktzoglou, A. Kirpalani, T. J. Carroll, D. Li, and J. C. Carr
Dark-Blood MRI of the Thoracic Aorta with 3D Diffusion-Prepared Steady-State Free Precession: Initial Clinical Evaluation
Am. J. Roentgenol., October 1, 2007; 189(4): 966 - 972.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1984 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.