AJR Women's Imaging Online
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bies,
Right arrow Articles by Ehrlich, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bies, , JR
Right arrow Articles by Ehrlich, C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 143, Issue 6, 1249-1257
Copyright © 1984 by American Roentgen Ray Society


Articles

Assessment of primary gynecologic malignancies: comparison of 0.15-T resistive MRI with CT

Bies JR, JH Ellis, KK Kopecky, GP Sutton, EC Klatte, FB Stehman, and CE Ehrlich

Thirty-eight patients with gynecologic malignancies (ovarian, cervical, and endometrial carcinoma) underwent computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the abdomen and pelvis. Results of these studies were compared with each other as well as with clinical staging and surgical findings when possible. CT and MRI correctly staged 64% (nine of 14) of patients with cervical carcinoma. In patients suspected of residual or recurrent disease, CT and MRI were each correct in 75% (15 of 20), four of the errors being due to inability to distinguish inflammation or radiation changes from recurrent tumor. CT and 0.15-T resistive MRI are of equal value in screening for residual or recurrent disease and as an adjunct to clinical staging; further advances in MRI technology may alter this impression.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1984 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.