AJR Customized AJR reprints in quantities as low as 100!
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bush, W.
Right arrow Articles by Brannen, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bush, W.
Right arrow Articles by Brannen, G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 144, Issue 1, 139-142
Copyright © 1985 by American Roentgen Ray Society


Articles

Percutaneous removal of caliceal calculi

WH Bush and GE Brannen

Of 170 patients who underwent percutaneous nephrostolithotomy, 61 had stones located in a calix. Direct access to the calix containing the calculus optimizes removal. Special maneuvers during and after percutaneous stone removal (e.g., parallel-tract push and loop snare retrieval system) facilitate removal of caliceal calculi from more difficult locations; 46% of patients with caliceal calculi required adjuvant radiologic techniques. Complete calculus removal was achieved in 90% of patients with caliceal calculi.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1985 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.