AJR Join ARRS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bunker,
Right arrow Articles by Rubal, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bunker, , SR
Right arrow Articles by Rubal, B.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 144, Issue 2, 295-298
Copyright © 1985 by American Roentgen Ray Society


Articles

Left ventricular volume determination from single-photon emission computed tomography

Bunker SR, MF Hartshorne, WP Schmidt, MA Cawthon, RD Karl Jr, JM Bauman, WH Howard 3rd, and BJ Rubal

To compare the accuracy of single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) with that of contrast cineangiography in measuring left ventricular end-diastolic volume, 25 consecutive patients undergoing catheterization for coronary artery or valvular heart disease were first evaluated scintigraphically. A simple, count-corrected voxel counting technique was used to derive left ventricular end-diastolic volume from transaxial SPECT slices. SPECT volume values showed a high degree of correlation with those determined by angiography (r = 0.969), with a standard error of the estimate of 23 ml. SPECT offers a highly accurate and essentially noninvasive method for measuring chamber volumes that is independent of geometric assumptions about ventricular configuration and chest wall attenuation and does not require blood sample counting.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JNMHome page
D. Daou, F. Harel, B. O. Helal, T. Fourme, P. Colin, R. Lebtahi, D. Mariano-Goulart, M. Faraggi, M. Slama, and D. Le Guludec
Electrocardiographically Gated Blood-Pool SPECT and Left Ventricular Function: Comparative Value of 3 Methods for Ejection Fraction and Volume Estimation
J. Nucl. Med., July 1, 2001; 42(7): 1043 - 1049.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
C. Vanhove, P. R. Franken, M. Defrise, A. Momen, H. Everaert, and A. Bossuyt
Automatic Determination of Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction from Gated Blood-Pool Tomography
J. Nucl. Med., March 1, 2001; 42(3): 401 - 407.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1985 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.