AJR Get Involved! Join ARRS Today
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Yuhasz, M
Right arrow Articles by Caroline, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Yuhasz, M
Right arrow Articles by Caroline, D.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 144, Issue 2, 303-307
Copyright © 1985 by American Roentgen Ray Society


Articles

Radiography of the small bowel in patients with gynecologic malignancies

M Yuhasz, I Laufer, G Sutton, H Herlinger, and DF Caroline

The records and radiographs of 284 patients with gynecologic malignancy were reviewed to determine the incidence and nature of small-bowel abnormalities. Seventeen percent of the patients had small-bowel studies. Twenty-four percent of patients with ovarian cancer had radiologic examination of the small bowel, and in almost all cases the abnormalities were due to metastatic disease. In patients with cervical cancer, small-bowel radiography was performed in 14% of patients, and in most cases the abnormalities were due to radiation damage. Small-bowel obstruction was found in 20 patients. In the ovarian-cancer group, all obstructions were due to metastatic disease, whereas in the cervical cancer group, obstruction was due to metastases, radiation, or adhesions. The site of obstruction was a useful differential point, since all obstructions due to radiation were in the ileum, whereas 58% of obstructions due to metastases were in the duodenum or jejunum. The radiologic studies interpreted in light of the clinical circumstances were highly accurate in determining the location and nature of small-bowel complications in these patients.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1985 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.