AJR Join ARRS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lee, W.
Right arrow Articles by Pochaczevsky, R
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lee, W.
Right arrow Articles by Pochaczevsky, R
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 144, Issue 3, 457-462
Copyright © 1985 by American Roentgen Ray Society


Articles

Percutaneous extraction of renal stones: experience in 100 patients

WJ Lee, G Loh, AD Smith, E White, B Greenspan, FM Vernace, and R Pochaczevsky

Recent developments in technology and instrumentation have made it possible to remove most kidney stones and many ureteral stones percutaneously. The first 100 cases at this institution were reviewed in which grasping, ultrasonic lithotripsy, basketing, and irrigation were used. In all cases, the follow-up was at least 1 year. The success rates were 92.4% for renal pelvic stones, 92% for caliceal stones, and 68% for ureteral stones. Ten of the 14 patients who required open operation after an unsuccessful percutaneous procedure were among the first 18 patients, whereas only one open operation was needed in the last 40 patients. Proper patient selection; the size, number, and location of stones; proper selection of the nephrostomy site; and the expertise of the operator are critical factors in determining the success rate. To date, the short-term results of percutaneous stone removal have been as good as those of open surgery.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1985 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.