AJR Women's Imaging Online
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pennes, D.
Right arrow Articles by Orringer, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pennes, D.
Right arrow Articles by Orringer, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 144, Issue 3, 507-511
Copyright © 1985 by American Roentgen Ray Society


Articles

Chest wall invasion by lung cancer: limitations of CT evaluation

DR Pennes, GM Glazer, KJ Wimbish, BH Gross, RW Long, and MB Orringer

Thirty-three patients with peripheral pulmonary malignancies contiguous with a pleural surface were evaluated for chest wall invasion by computed tomography (CT). CT criteria included pleural thickening adjacent to the tumor, encroachment on or increased density of the extrapleural fat, asymmetry of the extrapleural soft tissues adjacent to the tumor, apparent mass invading the chest wall, and rib destruction. The CT scans were classified as positive, negative, or equivocal for invasion, and a decision matrix was constructed comparing CT results with pathologic data. The sensitivity of CT was 38%, specificity was 40%, and accuracy was 39% for evaluation of invasion if equivocal CT results were counted as radiologic errors. CT scanning has low accuracy in assessing chest wall invasion in patients with peripheral lung cancers.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ChestHome page
W. J. Scott, J. Howington, and B. Movsas
Treatment of Stage II Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
Chest, January 1, 2003; 123(1_suppl): 188S - 201S.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Respir JHome page
J.A. Verschakelen, J. Bogaert, and W. De Wever
Computed tomography in staging for lung cancer
Eur. Respir. J., February 1, 2002; 19(35_suppl): 40S - 48s.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
E. F. Patz Jr
Imaging Bronchogenic Carcinoma
Chest, April 1, 2000; 117(4_suppl_1): 90S - 95S.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
J. Deslauriers and J. Gregoire
Clinical and Surgical Staging of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Chest, April 1, 2000; 117(4_suppl_1): 96S - 103S.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
N. Nakano, T. Yasumitsu, Y. Kotake, H. Morino, and J. Ikezoe
Preoperative histologic diagnosis of chest wall invasion by lung cancer using ultrasonically guided biopsy
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., March 1, 1994; 107(3): 891 - 895.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1985 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.