AJR ARRS Membership
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rubin, E
Right arrow Articles by Stanley, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rubin, E
Right arrow Articles by Stanley, R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 144, Issue 3, 623-627
Copyright © 1985 by American Roentgen Ray Society


Articles

Hand-held real-time breast sonography

E Rubin, VE Miller, LL Berland, SY Han, RE Koehler, and RJ Stanley

The results of real-time hand-held sonographic breast examinations on 86 patients are presented. The technique is described in detail. Sonography was found to be a useful adjunct to the x-ray mammogram in three groups of patients: (1) patients with dense breasts and localized symptomatology or a suspicious area on x-ray mammogram; (2) patients with nonpalpable abnormalities discovered on x-ray mammogram; and (3) patients with palpable masses considered indeterminate on x-ray mammogram. The examination was also found useful for guiding needle aspiration biopsies, in patients with persistent nipple discharge, and in those with breast prostheses. Advantages of the hand-held real-time technique include supine positioning, the ability to flexibly orient the probe, improved resolution due to higher frequency transducers and the lack of compounding, and the ability to vary the amount of compression to assess tissue compliance and fixation. The disadvantage of decreased resolution in the near field can be overcome by attaching a detachable water-path step-off device to the transducer. Geometric distortion from the pressure of the transducer was not believed to be a problem. Hand-held sonographic technique is useful when attention can be directed to a specific area of the breast. The additional information provided results in fewer equivocal interpretations of the x-ray mammogram; however, it should not be used as a substitute for routine mammography.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadiologyHome page
Q. Zhu, E. B. Cronin, A. A. Currier, H. S. Vine, M. Huang, N. Chen, and C. Xu
Benign versus Malignant Breast Masses: Optical Differentiation with US-guided Optical Imaging Reconstruction
Radiology, October 1, 2005; 237(1): 57 - 66.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
M. S. Soo, E. L. Rosen, J. A. Baker, T. T. Vo, and B. A. Boyd
Negative Predictive Value of Sonography with Mammography in Patients with Palpable Breast Lesions
Am. J. Roentgenol., November 1, 2001; 177(5): 1167 - 1170.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
G. Rahbar, A. C. Sie, G. C. Hansen, J. S. Prince, M. L. Melany, H. E. Reynolds, V. P. Jackson, J. W. Sayre, and L. W. Bassett
Benign versus Malignant Solid Breast Masses: US Differentiation
Radiology, December 1, 1999; 213(3): 889 - 894.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1985 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.