AJR Women's Imaging Online
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chang, V.
Right arrow Articles by Fromkes, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Chang, V.
Right arrow Articles by Fromkes, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 144, Issue 4, 753-755
Copyright © 1985 by American Roentgen Ray Society


Articles

Sonographic measurement of the extrahepatic bile duct before and after retrograde cholangiography

VH Chang, JJ Cunningham, and JJ Fromkes

The maximum diameter of the extrahepatic bile duct visible on cholesonograms was measured immediately before and immediately after endoscopic retrograde cannulation and injection of the biliary and pancreatic ducts (ERCP) in 24 patients. Sonographic bile duct diameter increased by 3 mm or more in nine patients, all of whom had had a previous cholecystectomy. Bile duct diameter was unchanged in the remaining 15 patients, six of whom had had cholecystectomy. The technical performance of ERCP alone will alter bile duct diameter in a significant proportion of patients having endoscopic cannulation of the biliary tree. This is particularly so for patients who have had their gallbladders removed. The true diameter of the extrahepatic bile duct cannot be determined in many patients by simple measurement of images obtained at ERCP, even when corrections are made for radiographic magnification.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
K. M. Vitellas, A. El-Dieb, K. K. Vaswani, W. F. Bennett, M. Tzalonikou, C. Mabee, R. Kirkpatrick, and J. G. Bova
MR Cholangiopancreatography in Patients with Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis: Interobserver Variability and Comparison with Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography
Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2002; 179(2): 399 - 407.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
K. M. Vitellas, M. T. Keogan, K. S. Freed, R. A. Enns, C. E. Spritzer, J. M. Baillie, and R. C. Nelson
Radiologic Manifestations of Sclerosing Cholangitis with Emphasis on MR Cholangiopancreatography
RadioGraphics, July 1, 2000; 20(4): 959 - 975.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1985 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.