AJR Your Link to CME
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by New, P.
Right arrow Articles by Brady, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by New, P.
Right arrow Articles by Brady, T.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 144, Issue 5, 1021-1026
Copyright © 1985 by American Roentgen Ray Society


Articles

MR imaging of the acoustic nerves and small acoustic neuromas at 0.6 T: prospective study

PF New, TB Bachow, GL Wismer, BR Rosen, and TJ Brady

To evaluate the capability of magnetic resonance (MR) in imaging normal acoustic nerves, 12 volunteers without signs or symptoms of intracranial disease were examined using a 0.6 T superconductive system. Several spin-echo (SE) pulse sequences were tested to identify the optimal sequence for demonstration of the acoustic nerve bundle. Repetition times (TRs) varied from 300 to 2000 msec and echo times (TEs) from 30 to 120 msec. A single-slice technique was used with 5 and 8 mm sections, one or two data acquisitions per projection, and axial and coronal imaging. The normal acoustic nerves were demonstrated readily by MR in axial and/or coronal sections. The distal parts of the nerves and tumors were imaged best with SE 1500/60. The medial extremities of the seventh and eighth nerves tended to be obscured in this sequence by brightening the cerebrospinal fluid signal adjacent to the brainstem, but they were demonstrated clearly with 500 or 800 msec TR and 30 msec TE. Five patients were studied who had hearing loss and evidence of retrocochlear disease. In four patients, MR imaging demonstrated five acoustic nerve tumors ranging in size from purely intracanalicular to a 12 mm cisternal component. In the fifth case, no tumor was identified by MR imaging or gas computed tomographic (CT) cisternography. Contrast-enhanced CT using a Siemens Somatom DR 3 or GE CT/T 8800 scanner failed to provide convincing evidence of tumor in any case, while gas CT cisternography was positive in all five tumors. All five acoustic neuromas were identified readily using the SE sequences that proved optimal for demonstration of normal nerves. This experience revealed that MR imaging can demonstrate the eighth nerve complex well and reliably. Single-slice (5 or 8 mm) technique is adequate, but multislice without tissue gaps (used recently) is more efficient. Small, even intracanalicular, acoustic neuromas are imaged effectively, indicating that the method is capable of superseding contrast CT cisternography, particularly with improving technology.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1985 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.