AJR ARRS Membership
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Poskitt, K.
Right arrow Articles by Sullivan, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Poskitt, K.
Right arrow Articles by Sullivan, L.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 144, Issue 5, 939-944
Copyright © 1985 by American Roentgen Ray Society


Articles

Sonography and CT in staging nonseminomatous testicular tumors

KJ Poskitt, PL Cooperberg, and LD Sullivan

The usefulness of sonography and computed tomography (CT) in the clinical staging of nonseminomatous testes tumors was examined by retrospectively reviewing the clinical staging of 57 patients. Twenty-five patients had sonographic examinations; two were considered inadequate and there were no false-positive results. Understaging occurred in 13% (3/23), while the negative predictive value for sonography was 73% (8/11). CT was performed on 29 patients; no patients were overstaged and only one examination was inadequate due to technical reasons. Understaging occurred in 18% (5/28), and CT had a negative predictive value of 67% (8/12). A subgroup of 18 patients having both sonography and CT was examined, and each staging procedure had a 22% false-negative and a 0 false-positive rate. Twenty-seven lymphangiograms, 28 excretory urograms, and 49 tumor marker determinations were also performed on this patient population, and their false-negative rates were 35%, 78%, and 61%, respectively. False-positive rates of 30% for lymphangiograms, 6% for tumor markers, and 0 for excretory urograms were also obtained. On the basis of these results, sonography and CT are equivalent and superior examinations that have a high degree of accuracy (90%) in predicting bulky metastatic disease, either stage B3 or C disease. All patients would have received appropriate therapy if both examinations were carried out. However, this same goal could have been achieved with greater cost efficiency by initial sonographic screening, followed by CT in only those patients with negative or inadequate sonographic examinations.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1985 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.