AJR ARRS Membership
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Flak, B
Right arrow Articles by Chung, W
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Flak, B
Right arrow Articles by Chung, W
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 144, Issue 5, 991-996
Copyright © 1985 by American Roentgen Ray Society


Articles

Magnetic resonance imaging of aneurysms of the abdominal aorta

B Flak, DK Li, BY Ho, WJ Knickerbocker, S Fache, J Mayo, and W Chung

Experience with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of 10 normal control patients and 13 patients with known abdominal aortic aneurysms is presented. The aorta, renal artery origins, and iliac arteries were clearly identified in all control patients. Ten out of 13 aneurysms were optimally visualized. Three cases early in the experience were poorly seen and permitted less confident measurements. Renal artery origins were identified in 12 cases and judged to be uninvolved by the aneurysm in 11. Iliac arteries were identified in 11 cases and judged to be definitely aneurysmal in three. Sonography clearly depicted all 13 aneurysms. Correlation of the actual anteroposterior (AP) and transverse diameter aneurysm measurements with both techniques was excellent. Sonography failed to identify the renal artery origins in all cases, but could infer noninvolvement in two cases. Iliac arteries were seen in eight cases and judged definitely aneurysmal in three. According to these preliminary results, both MRI and sonography provide accurate AP and transverse outer wall measurements. MRI is superior in determining the presence of renal and/or iliac involvement. The authors recommend, however, that sonography continue to be the preliminary screening method.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1985 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.