AJR Join ARRS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wandtke, J.
Right arrow Articles by Plewes, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wandtke, J.
Right arrow Articles by Plewes, D.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 144, Issue 6, 1171-1181
Copyright © 1985 by American Roentgen Ray Society


Articles

Exposure equalization radiography of the chest: clinical comparison of slit and raster scanning techniques

JC Wandtke and DB Plewes

Exposure equalization radiography systems with scanning slit and raster geometries were constructed and tested with 75 patients. The scanning equalization radiography (SER) technique uses a detector, placed behind the patient, connected in a feedback loop to a microprocessor-controlled x-ray source. The detector monitors the transmitted radiation, and in turn the x-ray output is varied to equalize the radiographic film density over the entire image. The clinical evaluation of these systems included 25 posteroanterior (PA) chest radiographs by an SER slit-geometry system (5.0-sec scan time), 25 PA chest radiographs by an SER raster-geometry system with an 8.8-sec scan time, and 25 PA chest radiographs by an SER raster-geometry system with a 4.7-sec scan time. These SER radiographs were compared to conventional radiographs of the same patients by two radiologists. The observers noted that the SER slit radiographs had seriously overexposed areas in 80% of instances, and that any potential gains from this system were offset by the overexposure problems. The radiographs obtained by the SER raster technique with a 4.7-sec scan time showed more uniform and adequate exposure in 80% of instances and better visualization of normal anatomic detail in the lung (52%) and mediastinum (84%) than conventional radiographs. The radiographs obtained by the SER raster technique with an 8.8-sec scan time showed fewer peripheral lung markings in 15 of 25 cases, presumably due to motion. In all other respects, the images were similar in quality to the SER raster 4.7-sec radiographs.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1985 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.