AJR ARRS Member Benefits
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Westcott, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Westcott, J.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 144, Issue 6, 1189-1193
Copyright © 1985 by American Roentgen Ray Society

Articles

Percutaneous catheter drainage of pleural effusion and empyema

JL Westcott

Fluoroscopy-guided percutaneous catheter drainage (PCD) was used in 38 patients to diagnose and/or treat pleural effusions (21), hemothorax (one), symptomatic malignant effusions (four), and empyemas (12). Fluoroscopic guidance combined with the use of a small needle, J-tip guide wire, and pigtail catheter made it possible to safely drain both free and loculated fluid collections, including areas with difficult access. In 11 of the 12 patients with empyema, the pus (or purulent fluid) was successfully drained using PCD. Two or more catheters were used in all but one patient. In four of the empyemas, PCD was used successfully after incomplete or unsuccessful chest tube drainage. In five, PCD was used as the sole means of drainage. In three patients, chest-tube drainage was used to drain residual (one) or recurrent (two) empyemas after PCD. The safety and relative ease of PCD makes it an attractive alternative method for closed drainage of pleural fluid collections.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 ThoraxHome page
I M Balfour-Lynn, E Abrahamson, G Cohen, J Hartley, S King, D Parikh, D Spencer, A H Thomson, D Urquhart, and on behalf of the Paediatric Pleural Diseases Subco
BTS guidelines for the management of pleural infection in children
Thorax, February 1, 2005; 60(suppl_1): i1 - i21.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 ThoraxHome page
C W H Davies, F V Gleeson, and R J O Davies
BTS guidelines for the management of pleural infection
Thorax, May 1, 2003; 58(90002): ii18 - 28.
[Full Text]

Home page
 ChestHome page
W. Parulekar, G. Di Primio, F. Matzinger, C. Dennie, and G. Bociek
Use of Small-Bore vs Large-Bore Chest Tubes for Treatment of Malignant Pleural Effusions
Chest, July 1, 2001; 120(1): 19 - 25.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Eur Respir JHome page
B. Ghaye and R.F. Dondelinger
Imaging guided thoracic interventions
Eur. Respir. J., March 1, 2001; 17(3): 507 - 528.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
C. W. H. DAVIES, S. E. KEARNEY, F. V. GLEESON, and R. J. O. DAVIES
Predictors of Outcome and Long-term Survival in Patients with Pleural Infection
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., November 1, 1999; 160(5): 1682 - 1687.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1985 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.