AJR ARRS Membership
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wall, S.
Right arrow Articles by Higgins, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wall, S.
Right arrow Articles by Higgins, C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 144, Issue 6, 1217-1221
Copyright © 1985 by American Roentgen Ray Society


Articles

Magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of abscesses

SD Wall, MR Fisher, EG Amparo, H Hricak, and CB Higgins

Ten patients with percutaneous biopsy or surgically proven abscesses were evaluated with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to describe the appearance of abscesses, define the capability of MRI to localize abscesses, and compare the capabilities of MRI and CT for the diagnosis and determination of the extent of an abscess. Comparative CT scans were available in six cases. The most common MRI finding was an abnormal area of low signal intensity, either homogeneous or heterogeneous, on the short repetition rate (500 msec TR) images with a relative increase in signal intensity on the longer repetition rate (1500 or 2000 msec TR) images. MRI demonstrated a more clear delineation of the extent of inflammatory changes than did CT, and MRI demonstrated the abscess as a collection distinct from surrounding structures on at least one repetition rate. Intravenous contrast medium was unnecessary with MRI to evaluate vasculature or to define the capsule around an abscess. With CT, unless an abscess contained air or was of low attenuation, it often blended with the surrounding structures and was difficult to differentiate from them. Surgical clips in the postoperative patient with an abscess did not degrade the MR images as often occurred with CT. This study describes the MRI appearance of abscess and indicates a potential value of the use of MRI to evaluate abscess outside the central nervous system and spine.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadiologyHome page
S. H. Hong, S. M. Kim, J. M. Ahn, H. W. Chung, M. J. Shin, and H. S. Kang
Tuberculous versus Pyogenic Arthritis: MR Imaging Evaluation
Radiology, March 1, 2001; 218(3): 848 - 853.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
D. J. Theodorou, S. J. Theodorou, Y. Kakitsubata, D. J. Sartoris, and D. Resnick
Imaging Characteristics and Epidemiologic Features of Atypical Mycobacterial Infections Involving the Musculoskeletal System
Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2001; 176(2): 341 - 349.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
T. A. Tukeva, H. J. Aronen, P. T. Karjalainen, P. Molander, T. Paavonen, and J. Paavonen
MR Imaging in Pelvic Inflammatory Disease: Comparison with Laparoscopy and US
Radiology, January 1, 1999; 210(1): 209 - 216.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1985 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.