Fluoroscopic and arthrographic evaluation of carpal instability

The efficacy of a diagnostic protocol involving videotape fluoroscopy of carpal motion and radiocarpal arthrography was evaluated in patients with wrist pain unexplained by physical examination and conventional radiographs. Videotape fluoroscopy was performed as the first study in 68 consecutive cases and was positive in 44 (66%). Radiocarpal arthrography was performed after videotape fluoroscopy in 39 of the cases (57%), including the 24 in which videotape fluoroscopy was normal and 15 others in which further information was desired in spite of positive videotape fluoroscopy. The addition of radiocarpal arthrography to videotape fluoroscopy increased the diagnostic yield to 52 (76%) of the 68 cases and excluded significant anatomic or dynamic abnormality in the others. The diagnosis was proven surgically in 25 cases. This protocol was efficacious for ligament tears of the proximal carpal row, triangular fibrocartilage tears, and proximal and midcarpal instability. Videotape fluoroscopy should be the primary method of evaluating patients with unexplained wrist pain, and arthrography should be done in those cases in which fluoroscopy is either normal or does not fully explain physical findings.
CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A.-P. C. WEISS, E. AKELMAN, and R. LAMBIASE Comparison of the Findings of Triple-Injection Cinearthrography of the Wrist with Those of Arthroscopy J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., March 1, 1996; 78(3): 348 - 56. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				A. J. WILSON, F. A. MANN, and L. A. GILULA Imaging the Hand and Wrist J Hand Surg Eur Vol., April 1, 1990; 15(2): 153 - 167. [PDF]