AJR Join ARRS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nahman, B.
Right arrow Articles by O'Toole, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nahman, B.
Right arrow Articles by O'Toole, R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 145, Issue 1, 97-99
Copyright © 1985 by American Roentgen Ray Society


Articles

Use of the Rotex needle in percutaneous biopsy of pulmonary malignancy

BJ Nahman, ME Van Aman, WE McLemore, and RV O'Toole

When the characteristics of 30 biopsy needles were reviewed in a recent study using cadaveric liver tissue, the Rotex needle was judged to yield notable crush artifact, poor histologic preservation, and small sample specimens. In the current review of the Rotex needle in percutaneous lung biopsy in 121 patients, the authors report 98% sensitivity for the presence of malignancy and 94% specificity for the absence of malignancy. Although the Rotex needle has shown poor results in liver substrate studies, it proved more than adequate for obtaining lung tissue and a subsequent diagnosis of pulmonary malignancy. This apparent contradiction is explained by the fact that the diagnosis of lung malignancy can be made from cytopathologic material and does not require histologic specimens in most cases.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ChestHome page
M. P. Rivera and A. C. Mehta
Initial Diagnosis of Lung Cancer: ACCP Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines (2nd Edition)
Chest, September 1, 2007; 132(3_suppl): 131S - 148S.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
G. Schreiber and D. C. McCrory
Performance Characteristics of Different Modalities for Diagnosis of Suspected Lung Cancer: Summary of Published Evidence
Chest, January 1, 2003; 123(1_suppl): 115S - 128S.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ThoraxHome page
Y. Lacasse, E. Wong, G. H Guyatt, and D. J Cook
Transthoracic needle aspiration biopsy for the diagnosis of localised pulmonary lesions: a meta-analysis
Thorax, October 1, 1999; 54(10): 884 - 893.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1985 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.