AJR Join ARRS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ford, K.
Right arrow Articles by Dunnick, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ford, K.
Right arrow Articles by Dunnick, N.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 145, Issue 2, 323-326
Copyright © 1985 by American Roentgen Ray Society


Articles

Intravenous digital subtraction angiography in the preoperative evaluation of renal masses

KK Ford, SD Braun, GA Miller Jr, GE Newman, and NR Dunnick

Intravenous digital subtraction angiography (DSA) was performed in 23 patients with renal masses to document tumor extension into the main renal vein or inferior vena cava. The DSA findings were compared with computed tomographic as well as surgical and pathologic findings. Additional data regarding the number of renal arteries present and the relative vascularity of the tumor were also gathered. DSA documented 17 true-negative renal veins, three true-positive renal veins, and one false-negative renal vein. Two patients could not hold their breath long enough to evaluate the renal vein. In 17 of 19 cases, single renal arteries to the affected kidney were correctly identified. In three patients, two renal arteries to the involved kidney were correctly identified. The renal masses were avascular in two patients, hypovascular in five, moderately vascular in eight, and hypervascular in seven. In one case the mass was out of the field of view, and vascularity was not evaluated. In these patients, DSA was an accurate and relatively noninvasive method to assist in the preoperative evaluation of renal masses.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1985 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.