AJR Join ARRS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kaplan, H.
Right arrow Articles by Scheithauer, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kaplan, H.
Right arrow Articles by Scheithauer, B.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 145, Issue 6, 1131-1140
Copyright © 1985 by American Roentgen Ray Society


Articles

CT of the sella turcica after transsphenoidal resection of pituitary adenomas

HC Kaplan, HL Baker Jr, OW Houser, ER Laws Jr, CF Abboud, and BW Scheithauer

A retrospective review of 120 patients undergoing transsphenoidal surgery for pituitary adenomas revealed that computed tomography (CT) was less sensitive and less specific than hormonal methods in identifying residual functioning adenomas. However, CT was the only useful method of evaluating nonfunctioning tumors, including pseudo-prolactinomas. Enlargement of the pituitary stalk, when seen on preoperative CT, was 100% predictive of "cure" if the enlargement returned to normal size on a remote follow-up scan (n = 8) and was 100% predictive of residual tumor if the enlargement persisted or evolved (n = 8). Resolution of stalk displacement was the next most reliable predictor of cure (91%, n = 11), but persistent displacement was less reliable than abnormal intrasellar enhancement in predicting the presence of residual tumor (71%, n = 28, vs. 81%, n = 26). Enhancement in the postoperative sella by other than normal pituitary gland was presumed to be due to inflammation in 19% of patients. Inflammatory enhancement was observed in the presence of autograft and homograft muscle plugs and, unlike enhancement due to untreated tumors, was observed to decrease in size and intensity with time. Intrasellar enhancement was an unreliable criterion of success or failure in cases of microadenoma. All 14 patients with functioning adenomas and preoperative parasellar tumor extension had persistent tumor at postoperative evaluation. Of the 47 patients with resected functioning adenomas who had CT scans showing empty or partly empty sellas after operation, 22 (47%) had hormonally detectable residual tumor.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Intensive Care MedHome page
A. S. Dumont, E. C. Nemergut II, J. A. Jane Jr, and E. R. Laws Jr
Postoperative Care Following Pituitary Surgery
J Intensive Care Med, May 1, 2005; 20(3): 127 - 140.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
P.-H. Yoon, D.-I. Kim, P. Jeon, S.-I. Lee, S.-K. Lee, and S.-H. Kim
Pituitary Adenomas: Early Postoperative MR Imaging After Transsphenoidal Resection
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., June 1, 2001; 22(6): 1097 - 1104.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1985 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.