AJR ARRS Member Benefits
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Daniels, D.
Right arrow Articles by Haughton, V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Daniels, D.
Right arrow Articles by Haughton, V.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 145, Issue 6, 1141-1146
Copyright © 1985 by American Roentgen Ray Society

Articles

Orbital apex: correlative anatomic and CT study

DL Daniels, P Pech, MC Kay, K Pojunas, AL Williams, and VM Haughton

A detailed analysis of the coronal anatomic and CT appearances of the orbital apex is presented. In cadavers, coronal CT 9800 scans of the orbital apex and precisely corresponding cryomicrotomic sections were obtained. The CT appearance of the optic nerve, anulus of Zinn, and cranial nerves III-VI at the superior orbital fissure and orbital apex were determined. These anatomic structures were also demonstrated in clinical CT studies. Practical applications of the anatomic landmarks in evaluating orbital apex tumors are illustrated.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1985 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.