AJR ARRS Member Benefits
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ott, D.
Right arrow Articles by Wu, W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ott, D.
Right arrow Articles by Wu, W.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 145, Issue 6, 1207-1210
Copyright © 1985 by American Roentgen Ray Society


Articles

Positive predictive value and examiner variability in diagnosing duodenal ulcer

DJ Ott, YM Chen, DW Gelfand, I Meschan, HA Munitz, RM Kerr, and WC Wu

The positive predictive value of a diagnosis of duodenal ulcer was studied in 255 patients with 274 ulcers diagnosed radiographically. Retrospective analysis of the radiographic examinations and correlation with endoscopy assessed examiner variability, ulcer size, duodenal bulb deformity, and the confidence level of the ulcer diagnoses. For all diagnoses, the overall positive predictive value was 57% with individual predictive values of 47%, 54%, and 70% among three examiners. The individual predictive values correlated directly with the average level of confidence of the diagnoses for each examiner. The sensitivity of the individual examiner for ulcer detection had an inverse relation to the examiner's positive predictive value, confirming that higher sensitivities are achieved at the expense of an increased false-positive rate.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1985 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.