AJR Women's Imaging Online
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Traughber, P.
Right arrow Articles by Alazraki, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Traughber, P.
Right arrow Articles by Alazraki, N.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 146, Issue 1, 87-91
Copyright © 1986 by American Roentgen Ray Society


Articles

Negative bone scans of joints after aspiration or arthrography: experimental studies

PD Traughber, BJ Manaster, K Murphy, and NP Alazraki

It has long been suspected anecdotally that needle aspiration or contrast arthrogram before bone scan may cause a false-positive bone scan. This dictum often directs the sequence of events in the clinical workup of joint disease, yet data to support or refute this are lacking. This study was undertaken to generate such data. Fifty-six joints in mature dogs were examined, including hips, knees, elbows, and shoulders. The joints were examined in pairs; one joint was injected with Conray 60 for an arthrogram, and the contralateral joint was injected with an equal volume of normal saline to simulate a joint aspiration. Confirmation of needle placement and injection into the joints was made with fluoroscopic and digital subtraction imaging. Numbers of attempts required for aspiration and quantity of contrast material extravasated were noted for each joint. Baseline 99mTc-HDP or 99mTc-MDP bone scans were done before the experimental joint aspirations, with follow-up scans at 24 and 96 hr. The scans showed no significant change from baseline after either needle aspiration or arthrogram. When the diagnostic workup suggests the need for such a procedure, it should be performed. In contradiction to popular belief, joint aspiration and/or arthrogram did not affect a subsequent bone scan.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
CLIN PEDIATRHome page
R. S. Van Howe, R. J. Starshak, and M. J. Chusid
Chronic, Recurrent Multifocal Osteomyelitis: Case Report and Review of the Literature
Clinical Pediatrics, February 1, 1989; 28(2): 54 - 59.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1986 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.