AJR ARRS Membership
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Federle, M.
Right arrow Articles by Guillaumin, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Federle, M.
Right arrow Articles by Guillaumin, E.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 146, Issue 4, 685-689
Copyright © 1986 by American Roentgen Ray Society


Articles

CT of subpulmonic pleural effusions and atelectasis: criteria for differentiation from subphrenic fluid

MP Federle, AS Mark, and ES Guillaumin

The ability to distinguish intrathoracic from intraabdominal fluid collections has important therapeutic implications. In the setting of peridiaphragmatic fluid collections CT accurately distinguishes between pleural and subphrenic fluid collections in most cases. Subpulmonic effusions represent a potential pitfall to CT diagnosis, however, because the atelectatic basilar lung segments appear on axial CT sections as a curvilinear band density that simulates the hemidiaphragm. Fluid found anterior to this "pseudodiaphragm" will erroneously be diagnosed as subphrenic unless the atelectatic lung is recognized as such. New CT observations are reported that allowed confident diagnosis in 18 consecutive cases of subpulmonic effusions. The atelectatic lung was distinguished from the diaphragm because the atelectatic band appeared thickened (17 of 18 cases), tapered laterally (14 of 18), was interrupted rather than continuous (17 of 18), and could be followed in contiguous cephalad sections into lung that was confidently recognized by the presence of gas bubbles or air bronchograms (12 of 18).
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1986 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.