AJR Your Link to CME
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Barakos, J.
Right arrow Articles by Hightower, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Barakos, J.
Right arrow Articles by Hightower, D.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 146, Issue 6, 1161-1164
Copyright © 1986 by American Roentgen Ray Society


Articles

CT in the management of periappendiceal abscess

JA Barakos, RB Jeffrey Jr, MP Federle, VW Wing, FC Laing, and DR Hightower

Abdominal CT was the primary diagnostic method used to evaluate 40 patients with suspected periappendiceal abscess. Its subsequent impact on patient management was then analyzed for several categories of clinical presentation, including patients with and without a palpable right-lower-quadrant mass and postoperative patients. CT was reliable in distinguishing periappendiceal abscesses from phlegmons; 17 of 18 patients with phlegmons responded promptly to antibiotic therapy alone without need for surgery. Patients with larger, poorly localized abscesses underwent early surgical drainage. CT was successful in guiding percutaneous catheter drainage (nine patients) or aspiration (one patient) of well-localized periappendiceal abscesses in 10 of 11 patients. One attempted catheter drainage guided by sonography was technically unsuccessful. In patients without a palpable right-lower-quadrant mass, CT was helpful in establishing the diagnosis of periappendiceal inflammation. However, there were three false-positive diagnoses in patients with pericecal fluid collections including a ruptured cecal lymphoma, a ruptured cecal diverticulum, and a ruptured corpus luteum cyst. A diagnostic approach with CT is presented in patients with suspected periappendiceal abscess.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Arch SurgHome page
M. E. Cinat, S. E. Wilson, and A. M. Din
Determinants for Successful Percutaneous Image-Guided Drainage of Intra-abdominal Abscess
Arch Surg, July 1, 2002; 137(7): 845 - 849.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
B. A. Birnbaum and S. R. Wilson
Appendicitis at the Millennium
Radiology, May 1, 2000; 215(2): 337 - 348.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1986 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.