AJR Your Link to CME
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bush, W.
Right arrow Articles by Brannen, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bush, W.
Right arrow Articles by Brannen, G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 147, Issue 1, 89-93
Copyright © 1986 by American Roentgen Ray Society


Articles

Impact of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy on percutaneous stone procedures

WH Bush, RP Gibbons, GP Lewis, and GE Brannen

Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) is now the primary urologic treatment for symptomatic renal calculi; it is responsible for a substantial decrease in percutaneous stone removal procedures. Three hundred patients treated since ESWL became available are compared with the preceding 300 patients who were treated percutaneously. Since it became available, ESWL has been used alone on over 90% of patients. The cost of ESWL (average $7500) is similar to that of percutaneous removal procedures, and it causes less morbidity. Percutaneous techniques are still necessary before ESWL is performed (2%) for patients with a large number of stones or staghorn calculi, especially when there is obstruction. Percutaneous techniques alone (2%) may be necessary, especially if high-grade ureteropelvic junction obstruction is present. After ESWL, percutaneous drainage or retrieval of stone fragments may be required (2%). The need for interventional uroradiology persists, although its role is changing. For optimal patient care, the radiologist should provide the urologist with imaging consultation, radiation protection advice, and continued assistance in the less frequently used, though still essential, percutaneous calculus removal techniques.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1986 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.