AJR ARRS Membership
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sechtem, U
Right arrow Articles by Higgins, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sechtem, U
Right arrow Articles by Higgins, C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 147, Issue 2, 239-244
Copyright © 1986 by American Roentgen Ray Society


Articles

MRI of the normal pericardium

U Sechtem, D Tscholakoff, and CB Higgins

The visibility and thickness of the pericardium, as depicted by MRI, and the changes of these parameters over the cardiac cycle were determined in 18 normal subjects. Gated, cycled, multisection images were obtained in the transaxial orientation. Using a score-point system for quantification, there was better visualization of the low-intensity pericardial line during systole as compared with diastole (p less than 0.005). Pericardial thickness was 1.2 +/- 0.5 mm in diastole and 1.7 +/- 0.5 mm in systole (p less than 0.001) as measured in a midventricular section in front of the right ventricle; both values exceeded the thickness of 0.4 to 1.0 mm reported for anatomic measurements of pericardial thickness. The layer of normal pericardial fluid present in the pericardial space should also have low intensity, and it likely contributes to the overall pericardial thickness as visualized by MRI. Since MRI is sensitive to the small amount of normal pericardial fluid and depicts its anatomic distribution, it should be valuable in detection and quantification of even small pericardial effusions.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
D. J. Pennell, U. P. Sechtem, C. B. Higgins, W. J. Manning, G. M. Pohost, F. E. Rademakers, A. C. van Rossum, L. J. Shaw, and E. K. Yucel
Clinical indications for cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR): Consensus Panel report
Eur. Heart J., November 1, 2004; 25(21): 1940 - 1965.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
B. Giorgi, N. R. A. Mollet, S. Dymarkowski, F. E. Rademakers, and J. Bogaert
Clinically Suspected Constrictive Pericarditis: MR Imaging Assessment of Ventricular Septal Motion and Configuration in Patients and Healthy Subjects
Radiology, August 1, 2003; 228(2): 417 - 424.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1986 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.