AJR Women's Imaging Online
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Weinreb, J.
Right arrow Articles by Smith, T
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Weinreb, J.
Right arrow Articles by Smith, T
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 147, Issue 4, 785-790
Copyright © 1986 by American Roentgen Ray Society


Articles

Imaging the pediatric liver: MRI and CT

JC Weinreb, JM Cohen, E Armstrong, and T Smith

The livers of 27 children, 2 weeks to 16 years old, were examined with MRI and CT. Fourteen children had normal livers, 9 had focal liver disease, and 4 had diffuse liver disease. Normal intrahepatic venous anatomy was visualized more frequently with MRI than with CT, regardless of presence of disease, type of disease, or age. Focal hepatic lesions were either iso- or hypointense on relatively T1-weighted images and were hyperintense on T2-weighted images regardless of the pathology. In three cases, lesions seen with MRI were not detected with CT. In two other cases, CT was interpreted as equivocal or abnormal, but the liver was normal on MRI. MRI was superior to CT for evaluation of patency of the intrahepatic portion of the inferior vena cava. Other than in cases of fatty infiltration, CT provided no information additional to MRI. MRI has the potential to replace CT as a technique for imaging the pediatric liver in many cases, especially for infants and young children.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
NeoReviewsHome page
M. I. Levene
Historical Perspectives: The Early Development of Neonatal Magnetic Resonance Imaging
NeoReviews, July 1, 2006; 7(7): e329 - e333.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CLIN PEDIATRHome page
M. S. Glassman, S. A. Klein, and W. Spivak
Evaluation of Cavernous Transformation Of the Portal Vein by Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Clinical Pediatrics, February 1, 1993; 32(2): 77 - 80.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1986 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.