AJR ARRS Membership
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jagannath, A.
Right arrow Articles by Sniderman, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Jagannath, A.
Right arrow Articles by Sniderman, K.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 147, Issue 6, 1123-1126
Copyright © 1986 by American Roentgen Ray Society


Articles

Aortic dissection: a statistical analysis of the usefulness of plain chest radiographic findings

AS Jagannath, TA Sos, SH Lockhart, S Saddekni, and KW Sniderman

Findings on plain chest radiographs of patients with aortic dissection are variable and often overlap those of patients without dissection. To determine which findings were most useful in predicting aortic dissection, plain chest radiographs from 36 patients with aortographically proven aortic dissection and 36 patients from a control population were randomized and analyzed independently by five radiologists for the presence of various radiographic features associated with this condition. A widened aortic knob, widened descending aorta, and widened mediastinum showed the greatest interobserver agreement (p less than .001) although the overall interobserver agreement was poor. The final conclusion of the radiologists was a better predictor of dissection than any of the individual radiographic features alone. Widening of the mediastinum (p less than .001) and widening of the aortic knob (p less than .012) were the only two radiographic features of significance in predicting dissection. In a stepwise multiple logistic regression model, the radiologists achieved an overall accuracy of 85%, a sensitivity of 81%, and a specificity of 89%. Although this illustrates the usefulness of plain chest radiographs in diagnosing aortic dissection, poor interobserver agreement dictates that further definitive investigation be undertaken.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
S. Lewis, I. Ryder, and A. T. Lovell
Peripartum presentation of an acute aortic dissection
Br. J. Anaesth., April 1, 2005; 94(4): 496 - 499.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Emerg. Med. J.Home page
H S H Hado, J H B Scarpello, T Barton, H Scarborough, and T A Elhadd
A case of thoracic aortic dissection presenting as lateral pleuritic chest pain
Emerg. Med. J., March 1, 2005; 22(3): 229 - 230.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
I. A. Khan and C. K. Nair
Clinical, Diagnostic, and Management Perspectives of Aortic Dissection*
Chest, July 1, 2002; 122(1): 311 - 328.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
M. Klompas
Does This Patient Have an Acute Thoracic Aortic Dissection?
JAMA, May 1, 2002; 287(17): 2262 - 2272.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Intern MedHome page
Y. von Kodolitsch, A. G. Schwartz, and C. A. Nienaber
Clinical Prediction of Acute Aortic Dissection
Arch Intern Med, October 23, 2000; 160(19): 2977 - 2982.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1986 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.