AJR ARRS Member Benefits
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sickles, E.
Right arrow Articles by Sollitto, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sickles, E.
Right arrow Articles by Sollitto, R.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 147, Issue 6, 1149-1153
Copyright © 1986 by American Roentgen Ray Society

Articles

Baseline screening mammography: one vs two views per breast

EA Sickles, WN Weber, HB Galvin, SH Ominsky, and RA Sollitto

To compare the advantages of one-view vs two-view mammography screening, films were reviewed for 2500 consecutive asymptomatic women undergoing baseline mammography. To provide screening at low cost, examinations were limited to two radiographs per breast, one each in the craniocaudal and mediolateral oblique projections, with the understanding that those few patients with detected abnormalities would require additional mammograms, taken with an individually directed, problem-solving approach, at considerably higher cost. Two separate interpretations were made of each case, one using only the oblique projection images, the other using both oblique and craniocaudal views. Two-view interpretations not only identified more cancers than one-view readings (27 vs 25), they also required fewer additional mammograms to evaluate potential abnormalities (179 vs 642, 7% vs 26%). These advantages outweigh the additional radiation risk and added cost. Baseline screening mammography should be done with two views per breast.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 RadiologyHome page
S. J. Kim, W. K. Moon, N. Cho, J. H. Cha, S. M. Kim, and J.-G. Im
Computer-aided Detection in Digital Mammography: Comparison of Craniocaudal, Mediolateral Oblique, and Mediolateral Views
Radiology, December 1, 2006; 241(3): 695 - 701.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 BMJHome page
H. Thornton
Many subjects in trial were not asked for consent
BMJ, February 24, 1996; 312(7029): 509 - 509.
[Full Text]

Home page
 BMJHome page
N. J Wald, P. Murphy, P. Major, C. Parkes, J. Townsend, and C. Frost
UKCCCR multicentre randomised controlled trial of one and two view mammography in breast cancer screening
BMJ, November 4, 1995; 311(7014): 1189 - 1193.
[Abstract] [Full Text]

Home page
 BMJHome page
C F Allaart, F R Rosendaal, W M P Noteboom, J P Vandenbroucke, and E Briet
Survival in families with hereditary protein C deficiency, 1820 to 1993
BMJ, October 7, 1995; 311(7010): 910 - 912.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1986 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.